[Bug] [Master] when processDefinition processExecutionType is serial_wait or serial_priority processInstance always 'ready stop'

[fw19940314]

Search before asking

• I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

What happened

When I configure processDefinition executionExecutionType is serial_wait or serial_priority , After starting the processDefinition generate processInstance.

Perform the STOP action on the page, processInstance state always 'ready stop' .

What you expected to happen

When the process instance state is set to 'ready stop' , master in WorkflowStateEventHandler Can judge processDefinition processExecutionType, if type is serial_wait or serial_priority , return directly.

code:

How to reproduce

processDefiniton executionExecutionType is serial_wait or serial_priority.

Anything else

No response

Version

3.1.x

Are you willing to submit PR?

• Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[github-actions]

Thank you for your feedback, we have received your issue, Please wait patiently for a reply.

• In order for us to understand your request as soon as possible, please provide detailed information, version or pictures.
• If you haven't received a reply for a long time, you can join our slack and send your question to channel #troubleshooting

[xiangtao]

are there any errors in log ?

[fw19940314]

are there any errors in log ?

No exception log. I have tried to modify the code and the problem has been solved, but I am not sure if it is feasible

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.

[github-actions]

This issue has been closed because it has not received response for too long time. You could reopen it if you encountered similar problems in the future.

[stephenking30]

are there any errors in log ?

No exception log. I have tried to modify the code and the problem has been solved, but I am not sure if it is feasible

hi,bro,How did you solve the problem？can you tell me？