Replies: 1 comment
-
Implemented by #409 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
For now, we already have
AccessorMetadata
which carries the accessor's name and scheme.In this proposal, we plan to add capabilities support in AccessorMetadata, so that users can check whether the underlying accessor support extending features like
presign
ormultipart
.Along with this change, we will return
Unsupported
errors for not supported operations instead ofpanic
.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions