We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
any
develop
No response
dledgerRecoverAbnormally should use dispatchRequest.getBufferSize() not dispatchRequest.getMsgSize()
dledgerRecoverAbnormally
dispatchRequest.getBufferSize()
dispatchRequest.getMsgSize()
Kill broker process and recover it.
processOffset is equal with max offset.
processOffset
the processOffset in log should be much smaller than expected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Before Creating the Bug Report
I found a bug, not just asking a question, which should be created in GitHub Discussions.
I have searched the GitHub Issues and GitHub Discussions of this repository and believe that this is not a duplicate.
I have confirmed that this bug belongs to the current repository, not other repositories of RocketMQ.
Runtime platform environment
any
RocketMQ version
develop
JDK Version
No response
Describe the Bug
dledgerRecoverAbnormally
should usedispatchRequest.getBufferSize()
notdispatchRequest.getMsgSize()
Steps to Reproduce
Kill broker process and recover it.
What Did You Expect to See?
processOffset
is equal with max offset.What Did You See Instead?
the
processOffset
in log should be much smaller than expected.Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: