Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does archaic -мак verb form accept additional affixes #36

Open
mansayk opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Does archaic -мак verb form accept additional affixes #36

mansayk opened this issue Feb 18, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lexc twol

Comments

@mansayk
Copy link
Member

mansayk commented Feb 18, 2019

We have this statement in lxc:

%<ger1%>:%>м%{A%}%{K%} GER-INFL ;

For example:

Бармак, килмәк. 

I cannot remember it taking additional affixes, like case or possession:

килмәге, килмәгрәк, килмәктер, шикләнмәге, шаярмагы, бозылмагын

These word forms are (were) not possible, I think.

So, maybe we can also change it as:

%<ger1%>:%>м%{A%}к GER-INFL ;

and make some more restrictions, right?

Am I correct here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request lexc twol
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants