Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📚 Documentation: links looks wrong at the bottom of Readme file #44

Closed
2 tasks done
sinadarvi opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
2 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@sinadarvi
Copy link

💭 Description

The Getting Started link at the bottom of the readme file (below the Learn More section) looks wrong. If you click on it, you will be navigated to getting started with flutter docs. even in the last link, flutter have been mentioned in it. "Appwrite Flutter Playground".

also, the "Code of Conduct" link is broken too. I didn't see such a file nor in this repo or appwrite itself.

👀 Have you spent some time to check if this issue has been raised before?

  • I checked and didn't find similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Code of Conduct?

@stnguyen90
Copy link
Contributor

@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Dec 9, 2022
@Atsurak
Copy link

Atsurak commented Dec 29, 2022

so here are the links for getting started with web https://appwrite.io/docs/getting-started-for-web and web playground https://github.com/appwrite/playground-for-web should I raise a PR to fix this?

@Atsurak
Copy link

Atsurak commented Jan 10, 2023

link to code of conduct is broken in all repos are there any plans to fix this?

@stnguyen90
Copy link
Contributor

link to code of conduct is broken in all repos are there any plans to fix this?

@Atsurak, yes, there's a PR for that pending merge.

@stnguyen90
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by appwrite/appwrite#5360

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants