Weird for loop

[Th3F4nd1t]

Highlighted line returns syntax error, same if I replace result * i with 1.
Does Brainrot have the ability to reassign?
Any help would be sigma.

[Somespi]

After some investigation (only scanning the source code) , i don't think it supports that.

in evaluate_expression function, it includes:

case NODE_IDENTIFIER:
        return get_variable(node->data.name);

where if I'm correct, it only deals with the variable as immutable, as it does not count for the case where the grammar could be IDENTIFIER = VALUE;

Not so sure, but I think we could add an if statement in the evaluate_expression function to handle that case, so not a big deal.

[araujo88]

Nice catch! I'll look into that sus for loop and see if I could fix it and add more rizz to the language.

[SolsticeSpectrum]

It doesn't support multiple things.
If you wanna assign integer itself you can't do

int i = 2;
i = i + 2;

Instead you have to do

int i = 2;
int i = i + 2;

Also for debugging purposes I recommend doing the brainrot keyword assignment on release build,
otherwise for test use normal keywords

arrays don't exist, should be implemented to allow at least basic tasks
should allow some sort of user input too to make at least a functional calculator
lastly comments should be allowed, that should require only a simple regex

function calling would be legendary

[araujo88]

I plan on implementing these features you mentioned, but feel free to contribute and show all your rizz.

[araujo88]

This is now working, with a minor change on how the yapping function works:

skibidi main {
    rizz number = 5;
    rizz result = 1;

    flex (rizz i = 1; i <= number; i = i + 1) {
        result = result * i;
    }

    yapping("%d", result);
    bussin 0;
}

This prints the following:

[leonardo@archlinux brainrot]$ ./brainrot < examples/test.brainrot 
120

Fixed in #14.