Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Oracle Handler #1846

Closed
S-Stephen opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Oracle Handler #1846

S-Stephen opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@S-Stephen
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Graphql-mesh looks like a great solution. We have many services which run on various databases, one of which is Oracle. Providing an Oracle handler would mean that Graphql-mesh could query across all our datasources.

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to an Oracle handler

Describe alternatives you've considered

We have the join-monster package working on the reference implementation. The configuration is database agnositc and therefore allows use ability to move our database in the future

@ardatan
Copy link
Owner

ardatan commented Mar 31, 2021

That sounds really cool feature for GraphQL Mesh!
We'd love to help and accept any contribution if someone decides to create a draft PR!

@hinogi
Copy link

hinogi commented Dec 22, 2021

@ardatan Is there a how-to on how to develop fixes for graphql mesh? is there a example config or a script to spin up some env ?

@hinogi
Copy link

hinogi commented Dec 22, 2021

Also, maybe someone that has experience with writing handlers can translate this into a handler? https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/blob/cefddd95c550191d6a18cb53c8ea4995d0c219ca/src/driver/oracle/OracleDriver.ts

@Urigo Urigo mentioned this issue Aug 11, 2022
46 tasks
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 18, 2022
@gilgardosh gilgardosh converted this issue into discussion #4521 Sep 18, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants