[Feature Request] Add BTHome support to default tasmota32-bluetooth driver

[AleXSR700]

Hi everyone,
@Staars recently added BTHome support to the esp32_mi BLE driver and I was wondering if this could be added to the "normal" bluetooth driver loaded when building using tasmota32-bluetooth config?

Problem is that my ESP32 is being used as a BLE to wifi hub for TRVs and I lose the ability to use any other BLE devices when switching to the BTHome supporting driver.

Would be really cool if it could be added to the normal BLE driver. No problem to custom build of course as long as the driver continues to work with all other BLE devices :)

Thank you for considering.

Alex

EDIT for reference:
#20625

[AleXSR700]

Maybe as an additional pro:
pvvx support will be deprecated so the current implementation of mijia support in tasmota32-bluetooth will stop working.

[AleXSR700]

Anybody here who could and would help with this?

[AleXSR700]

Just fyi because I had linked the initial PR earlier, I just read the release notes for the latest tasmota stable release and it seems Staars updated his initial BTHome implementation in #20989

Please, let me know if you need a tester for BTHome devices. I have a bunch and am happy to flash an esp32 with a test version in case you don't have any BTHome devices (or would simply like a beta tester:) ).

[AleXSR700]

Just wanted to check in and see if there is any way I can be of assistance this week? :)

[AleXSR700]

Hello barbudor,
did you by any chance have time to take a look at the BTHome implementation? :)

[AleXSR700]

Just my keep-alive hoping BTHome support will be added to the tasmota32-bluetooth firmware 🙏

[AleXSR700]

👋

[AleXSR700]

Push :)

[DJVirus1980]

What about add BTHome v2 support?

[g6094199]

will be ignored like the reqeusts before....

[Jason2866]

Not ignored. Open Source Software is not where you can make wishes and this wishes will be statisfied.
So maybe someone is someday coding this feature and adds it. The idea is open and pushing it every month will not change anything on this.

[AleXSR700]

I was just pushing because barbudor commented that he was swamped but would look into it when he had time. Since I cannot expect him to have it on his todo, it is my job to follow up :)

[Hypfer]

@AleXSR700 No, it is not "your job" to "follow up".

You were told clearly and unmistakably by a member of the project that you are to cease the spam because that's not how it works.
That barbudor user is not a member of the project. If you feel like you are obliged to ping them, go send them an email. The address is on their profile.

[AleXSR700]

I was not disagreeing nor saying that I would continue to do so. I was simply explaining why ;)

[barbudor]

Sorry @AleXSR700 I too bury down in work these time, I don't have much time for tasmota and also the BLE stuff is quite compilcated. Not even sure I would succeed.
Let asks to @btsimonh to have a look into.