-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify differences between sqlcomment and otelsql #4
Comments
I think it provides additional value to track where the request comes from, from apiv1, GraphQL, or gRPC functions. The merge in Google's term applied to the spec, the trace collector, and the cloud service. For client instruction, it's fine if we have two separate packages to provide the functions. Link the issue: XSAM/otelsql#109 |
hey @StevenACoffman |
hey @StevenACoffman! Sqlcommenter is a standard created at Google and recently accepted into OpenTelemetry. It's an interesting addition, and I'm curious to see how the integration will take place. In general, with Sqlcommenter works quite differently. It works on the ORM layer, by injecting metadata containing comments as part of the SQL statements that are sent to the database. These logs are then ingested on the database side (with support from Cloud SQL Insights, a proprietary Google Cloud offering). I am not aware of OSS solutions that do this ingestion and expose this data to the user. yet, but I'm sure with this becoming part of To answer your question:
HTH |
Thanks! That's very helpful. I was hoping to get
I'd like to be able to use both Cloud SQL Insights and Cloud Trace in my application. Does |
Oh, nevermind, it looks like it does just that: Line 17 in 6bb67a6
|
I read that Sqlcommenter merged into OpenTelemetry.
I have database connection code that I have already instrumented with https://github.com/XSAM/otelsql
and I am wondering if adding sqlcomment is redundant or if it would provide additional value?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: