ruff check fix E305 "blank-lines-after-function-or-class" adds incorrectly placed newlines.

[kaddkaka]

ruff check fix E305 "blank-lines-after-function-or-class" adds incorrectly placed newlines in ruff version 0.4.4

input code:

class A:
    pass

# ====== Cool constants ========
BANANA = 100
APPLE = 200

cmd: ruff check --fix --select=E305 tmp.py --isolated --preview

output:

class A:
    pass

# ====== Cool constants ========


BANANA = 100
APPLE = 200

Expected output:

class A:
    pass


# ====== Cool constants ========
BANANA = 100
APPLE = 200

Could this rule mistakenly identifying the comment as belonging to the class even if the indentation should tell otherwise?