You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Although C420 has not been implemented yet, it would make sense (and seems to match what has been done before) to merge the rules in favour of the flake8 plugin. Although the rule request was made to Ruff first (#9592, adamchainz/flake8-comprehensions#552), my understanding is that Ruff favours strong coupling to flake8.
unnecessary-dict-comprehension-for-iterable (RUF025) now exists as a flake8-comprehensions rule (adamchainz/flake8-comprehensions#553).
Although C420 has not been implemented yet, it would make sense (and seems to match what has been done before) to merge the rules in favour of the flake8 plugin. Although the rule request was made to Ruff first (#9592, adamchainz/flake8-comprehensions#552), my understanding is that Ruff favours strong coupling to flake8.
search terms: RUF025, flake8-comprehensions, duplicate, duplication
Related to #2714
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: