B909 False-positive: Detects immediate break but not return

[Avasam]

• List of keywords you searched for before creating this issue. Write them down here so that others can find this issue more easily and help provide feedback.
  B909

• A minimal code snippet that reproduces the bug.

def __pop_image_type(split_image: Iterable[AutoSplitImage], image_type: ImageType):
    for image in split_image:
        if image.image_type == image_type:
            split_image.remove(image)
            return image

    return None

• The command you invoked (e.g., ruff /path/to/file.py --fix), ideally including the --isolated flag.
  ruff check . --isolated --select=B909 --preview
• The current Ruff version (ruff --version).
  ruff 0.5.6

See the reproducer above, I'd expect that to pass, given that the below code also passes, but is much less cleaner:

def __pop_image_type(split_image: list[AutoSplitImage], image_type: ImageType):
    for image in split_image:
        if image.image_type == image_type:
            split_image.remove(image)
            break
    else:
        return None

    return image