Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reminder: Have a closer look at confidence intervals #3

Open
atecon opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Reminder: Have a closer look at confidence intervals #3

atecon opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@atecon
Copy link
Owner

atecon commented May 11, 2023

One more thought on this: Your help text talks about data-driven block sizes which are in the range 4 ... 13. So maybe sizes of 2 or 3 or not very interesting or meaningful anyway? Or to put it differently: What happens if you choose the recommended block size for the sample size, and then vary that size a little bit? If this still changes the results (confidence intervals) a lot, then maybe that's more problematic.

I have no idea whether this functions is actually implemented in some other language...

Don't know, but it seems that for their paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.00577.pdf) those Gao, Peng and Yan guys have implemented it somehow, for comparison. Haven't seen any code offerings, though.

Anyway, they write "It seems that the MBB method always generates a CI larger than it should be", so perhaps your latest result of having a wide band (although not so wide as before) is in line with that.

@atecon atecon added the enhancement New feature or request label May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant