Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bower still needed? #64

Open
bkcummins opened this issue Jun 21, 2016 · 11 comments
Open

bower still needed? #64

bkcummins opened this issue Jun 21, 2016 · 11 comments

Comments

@bkcummins
Copy link

bkcummins commented Jun 21, 2016

Have been using this tool for over a year now and am super grateful for it. Thx!

Curious though if folks are moving away from Bower??? Is there still a need when most dependencies are also in npm where devDependencies are as well?

Could/should this be streamlined? Would appreciate hearing feedback for or against. If you've done this which asset builder tool(s) have you used with Gulp?


Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

@janperse
Copy link

I would appreciate to get some info on that as well.

@cimocimocimo
Copy link

I second making Bower optional. I prefer to use npm for installing packages.

@deviationist
Copy link

I would also appreciate if bower was optional. I'm using NPM for package managment but still love to use asset-builder for every other thing.

@deviationist
Copy link

I'm planning on doing a fork and hopefully a pull request to fix this. Anyone want to contribute, or know anyone currently working on this?

@austinpray
Copy link
Owner

Pull requests accepted! Hit me up if you need help

@austinpray
Copy link
Owner

But generally if you are using npm to install your packages you can use something like webpack as a module loader as the packages are much more well behaved.

@alex-aloia
Copy link

Any progress on this yet? I have used this library in the past and found it really useful. I tried using it in a project today that is not utilizing Bower, and was surprised to realize I couldn't opt out of Bower integration. I modified the code to accept a config option ("bower:false"). I can submit a pull request if interested... Then I won't have to fork :)

@austinpray
Copy link
Owner

Pull requests will definitely be accepted but curious why you wouldn't just use webpack.

@alex-aloia
Copy link

Some of the code is not modularized yet...

kohmaeda referenced this issue in kohmaeda/sage Feb 13, 2018
@deusith
Copy link

deusith commented Jul 4, 2019

Hello. Just came in to make note that Bower still is needed in 2019. Not only that, bu it seems like you also have to import at least one dependency from it (ie bower install font-awesome) so given the last relevant commit in this project is from 2015, some may consider it as abandoned..

A shame, it has some really good ideas. Old ones, but useful even in this time.

@vijayhardaha
Copy link

Any update on this? We need bower optional here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants