Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the significance of the blur in the skeleton on Example 2? #44

Open
schollz opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

What is the significance of the blur in the skeleton on Example 2? #44

schollz opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@schollz
Copy link

schollz commented Jun 13, 2017

I refer to this example:

In this example, image A is a slightly blurred version of image A'. What is the significance of this for the NN? Why not just use the non-blurred version of the skeleton face for both A and A'? Does the amount of blur make a difference?

My own examples

Test 1

In my own results I tested going from photo (A) -> watercolor of the photo (A'). Then I use another similar photo (B) to generate a watercolor for that photo (B'). This way produces pretty unsatisfactory results.

A

19114764_10213232260783929_1021121038_n

A'

19114532_10213232356586324_723944625_n

B

19184093_10213232257223840_82941991_n

B'

19191065_10213232259383894_653646551_n

Test 2

Following the skeleton method, I use a blurred image of watercolor of a photo (A) -> watercolor of the photo (A'). Then I use a similar photo (B) to generate a watercolor for that photo (B') which produces much better results. I don't know why this method works better than the former, it is somewhat non-intuitive for me.

A

19113434_10213232356266316_42629097_n

A'

19114532_10213232356586324_723944625_n

B

19184093_10213232257223840_82941991_n

B'

19114810_10213232342505972_1864231564_n

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant