feat(parameters): add support for custom AWS SDK v3 clients for providers

[shdq]

This PR is intended to add support for custom AWS SDK v3 clients for providers

Providers covered:

• AppConfigProvider
• DynamoDBProvider
• SecretsProvider
• SSMProvider

Description of your changes

How to verify this change

Related issues, RFCs

Issue number: #1222

PR status

Is this ready for review?: NO
Is it a breaking change?: NO

Checklist

• My changes meet the tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code where necessary, particularly in areas that should be flagged with a TODO, or hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have made corresponding changes to the examples
• My changes generate no new warnings
• The code coverage hasn't decreased
• I have added tests that prove my change is effective and works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally and in Github Actions
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published
• The PR title follows the conventional commit semantics

Breaking change checklist

• I have documented the migration process
• I have added, implemented necessary warnings (if it can live side by side)

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

[shdq]

Hey @dreamorosi 👋
I hope you're doing well!

I have a couple of things to discuss:

To make clientConfig and awsSdkV3Client mutually exclusive I came up with this solution with types. Any comments?
If it is a decent way to type options, I will move to other providers.

The constructor method is getting messy, if it's ok we can leave it as is, or we can make something like in other packages with this.setOptions(options);

In tests, I used serviceId config option because when I try to set region for the client it doesn't work. Maybe a bug.

[shdq]

In the screenshot an example of the type error. The options variable has type error because it has both clientConfig and awsSdkV3Client properties. options2 and options3 variables don't have type errors.

[dreamorosi]

Thank you @shdq for working on this one, appreciate it!

I like the solution you have proposed with the interfaces, so let's go with it.

Regarding the setOptions method, I'd leave things as they are and prioritize the other items missing on the utility. However I agree with you, so if we make any further addition/change to the constructor, let's also extract the logic in its own method.