feat(appsync): support for read consistency during DynamoDB reads #20793
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
YichenQian09
force-pushed
the
read-consistency
branch
from
b35dc51
to
1d04a0a
Compare
|
Overall looks fine, but I'd rather see a test that shows that passing w/r/t the README, as a nit: It might be nice to have a link to the documentation ( https://docs.aws.amazon.com/appsync/latest/devguide/resolver-mapping-template-reference-dynamodb.html ) on how resolver mappings work and how you're passing them under the hood. |
indrora
previously requested changes
Jun 27, 2022
|
Thanks for your comment. |
github-actions
bot
added
effort/small
kaizencc
changed the title
chore: add unit test for dynamoDbScanTable
…s-cdk into read-consistency-v3
pahud
previously requested changes
Jul 19, 2022
Co-authored-by: Pahud Hsieh <pahudnet@gmail.com>
indrora
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2022
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
|
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
comcalvi
pushed a commit
to comcalvi/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 25, 2022
…s#20793) ---- Motivation: DynamoDB uses eventually consistent reads unless you specify otherwise. Now the users cannot specify consistent read during DynamoDB reads. This commit allows users to set consistent read while creating resolvers. Use case: To control the amount of replicas contacted during DynamoDB reads. most salient design aspects: Added an boolean parameter to the dynamoDbGetItem, dynamoDbScanTable and dynamoDbQuery methods in mapping-template.ts. Changed relative tests. closes aws#5980 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features I ran yarn tests. They include integration test snapshots for DynamoDB reads. Do I need to write a new integration test? * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
josephedward
pushed a commit
to josephedward/aws-cdk
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2022
…s#20793) ---- Motivation: DynamoDB uses eventually consistent reads unless you specify otherwise. Now the users cannot specify consistent read during DynamoDB reads. This commit allows users to set consistent read while creating resolvers. Use case: To control the amount of replicas contacted during DynamoDB reads. most salient design aspects: Added an boolean parameter to the dynamoDbGetItem, dynamoDbScanTable and dynamoDbQuery methods in mapping-template.ts. Changed relative tests. closes aws#5980 ---- ### All Submissions: * [x] Have you followed the guidelines in our [Contributing guide?](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) ### Adding new Unconventional Dependencies: * [ ] This PR adds new unconventional dependencies following the process described [here](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md/#adding-new-unconventional-dependencies) ### New Features I ran yarn tests. They include integration test snapshots for DynamoDB reads. Do I need to write a new integration test? * [x] Have you added the new feature to an [integration test](https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk/blob/main/INTEGRATION_TESTS.md)? * [x] Did you use `yarn integ` to deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e. `yarn integ` without `--dry-run`)? *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation: DynamoDB uses eventually consistent reads unless you specify otherwise. Now the users cannot specify consistent read during DynamoDB reads. This commit allows users to set consistent read while creating resolvers.
Use case: To control the amount of replicas contacted during DynamoDB reads.
most salient design aspects:
Added an boolean parameter to the dynamoDbGetItem, dynamoDbScanTable and dynamoDbQuery methods in mapping-template.ts. Changed relative tests.
closes #5980
All Submissions:
Adding new Unconventional Dependencies:
New Features
I ran yarn tests. They include integration test snapshots for DynamoDB reads. Do I need to write a new integration test?
yarn integto deploy the infrastructure and generate the snapshot (i.e.yarn integwithout--dry-run)?By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license