Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

New Pattern: aws-lambda-sagemaker #23

Closed
hnishar opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

New Pattern: aws-lambda-sagemaker #23

hnishar opened this issue Jul 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved

Comments

@hnishar
Copy link
Contributor

hnishar commented Jul 27, 2020

Add your +1 👍 to help us prioritize

Overview:

This AWS Solutions Construct implements an AWS Lambda function connected to an Amazon Amazon SageMaker.

User provided props for the construct:

  • Either an existing instances of Lambda Functions or the lambda.FunctionProps to deploy new Lambda Functions.
  • Optional deployInsideVpc to deploy the NotebookInstance inside VPC (default: true)
  • Optional subnetId if deployInsideVpc is true
  • Optional securityGroupIds if deployInsideVpc is true
  • Optional enableEncryption to encrypt the attached notebook instance storage volume(s) (default: true)
  • Optional encryptionKey user provided encryption key

Default settings

Out of the box implementation of the Construct without any override will set the following defaults:

Amazon SageMaker

  • Deploy SageMaker NotebookInstance inside VPC
  • Enable server-side encryption for SageMaker NotebookInstance using Customer Managed KMS Key

AWS Lambda Functions

  • Configure least privilege access IAM role for Lambda functions
  • Enable reusing connections with Keep-Alive for NodeJs Lambda functions
@hnishar hnishar added the feature-request A feature should be added or improved label Jul 27, 2020
@hnishar hnishar added the in-progress This issue is being actively worked on label Aug 15, 2020
@mickychetta mickychetta mentioned this issue Sep 16, 2020
Closed
@hnishar hnishar removed the in-progress This issue is being actively worked on label Oct 27, 2020
@hnishar
Copy link
Contributor Author

hnishar commented Oct 27, 2020

This pattern has been published in the latest release v1.70.0

@hnishar hnishar closed this as completed Oct 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hnishar