OP: integration test vs. unit test

[maurolacy]

@bap2pecs cloned issue babylonchain/babylon-contract#175 on 2024-06-19:

Context

I see babylon and btc-staking contracts both use integration tests like

// need to add dep `cosmwasm_vm`

static WASM: &[u8] = include_bytes!("../../../artifacts/my_contract.wasm");



#[test]

fn proper_initialization() {

  let mut deps = mock_instance(WASM, &[]);

」

why not just use unit test which is simpler and does not depend on the binary?

#[test]

fn proper_initialization() {

  let mut deps = mock_dependencies();

}

cc @maurolacy @SebastianElvis

Tasks

• decide the missing integration/uint tests

• implement those tests

[maurolacy]

@bap2pecs commented on 2024-07-08:

https://www.github.com/babylonchain/pm-integration/issues/5

[maurolacy]

@SebastianElvis commented on 2024-07-09:

This integration test is supposed to (almost) simulate the real scenario for executing a wasm contract on the wasm runtime. The unit test is still in our laptop/CI's runtime, e.g., x86. We at least need a simple integration test like that to ensure we don't screw up the wasm vm

[SebastianElvis]

@bap2pecs is this sill relevant?

[bap2pecs]

we can close it