-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Design review: update.php & "Task List" styling #991
Comments
Actually, now that youve mentioned it, this particular page Ive not liked; the indentation seems too much. And there's no lead in to the numbered items, like "before you continue, do these things:" |
I might like it better with the "continue" button to the right because it feels more natural or I guess that's what I'm used to form "next" type buttons. I don't mind the way it is now though. @jenlampton Are you referring to the overall design of this page? I think it is the same as the installer. Right? |
|
Re: the 2nd item ("Put your site into maintenance mode"), we are doing such a better job in the project installer with the checkbox to do just that without disrupting the task at hand: It would be perfect if we could add links/buttons to the tasks of creating a db dump and backing up the system, that when clicked download a .zip file of these things. In fact, this is how this should ideally work:
|
Tagging @quicksketch since I think he was working on this in #2804 for 1.8. Closing that other issue as a duplicate of this one. |
Feedback from the other issue:
|
I updated the styling slightly to vertically center the new checkmarks, and extended the "active" task item's background to the width of the entire task list. This issue includes a lot more suggestions than just updating the CSS, so I've incorporated the easy ones into a PR as well.
Updated PR: backdrop/backdrop#1989 |
From @docwilmot in GItter:
|
Super, merged backdrop/backdrop#1989 into 1.x for 1.8.0. |
There is a small issue with the wrapping of the list items. Nothing that a |
@quicksketch re-open the issue? ...file a new one? |
Re-opening for a follow-up commit. |
backdrop/backdrop#2015 reviewed and tested, so RTBC for me. As this issue is tagged as "status:fixed", should we open a separate issue ? |
Let's change the status back to RTBC.
…On Sep 28, 2017 4:01 AM, "opi" ***@***.***> wrote:
backdrop/backdrop#2015 <backdrop/backdrop#2015>
reviewed and tested, so RTBC for me. As this issue is tagged as
"status:fixed", should we open a separate issue ?
The initial install step looks really weird without this fix, and makes a
bed first impression to backdrop :/
[image: capture d ecran de 2017-09-28 13-01-08 - 1]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/159548/30963285-2ffaf5fa-a44d-11e7-8ba0-8ce2ead3500c.png>
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#991 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYSR87XJZzgSwPt6cphhD-dfXvapLfKks5sm3yggaJpZM4FAaa0>
.
|
backdrop/backdrop#2015 is already reviewed. |
[up] @quicksketch any chance to get this oneliner merged ? |
Thanks and sorry for the delay. Merged backdrop/backdrop#2015 into 1.x and 1.8.x! Thanks @klonos and @opi! |
Is the current look / feel for the updater what we want?
From #2804, which I am closing as dupe
PR by @jenlampton: backdrop/backdrop#1987PR by @quicksketch: backdrop/backdrop#1989
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: