Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(scaffolder-relation)!: migrate to new backend and remove deprecations #1459

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

PatAKnight
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, I just made a Pull Request!

  • Removes legacy backend system
  • Removes any deprecations

✔️ Checklist

  • A changeset describing the change and affected packages. (more info)
  • Added or updated documentation
  • Tests for new functionality and regression tests for bug fixes
  • Screenshots attached (for UI changes)
  • All your commits have a Signed-off-by line in the message. (more info)

@PatAKnight PatAKnight requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2024 19:46
@backstage-goalie
Copy link
Contributor

Changed Packages

Package Name Package Path Changeset Bump Current Version
@backstage-community/plugin-catalog-backend-module-scaffolder-relation-processor workspaces/scaffolder-relation-processor/plugins/catalog-backend-module-scaffolder-relation-processor major v1.2.9

…tions

Signed-off-by: Patrick <pknight@redhat.com>
@04kash 04kash force-pushed the scaffolder-relation-migration branch from 0dd48a9 to e6748e1 Compare October 2, 2024 19:36
@04kash 04kash self-requested a review as a code owner October 2, 2024 19:36
Copy link
Contributor

@schultzp2020 schultzp2020 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@04kash 04kash merged commit 94fb1a0 into backstage:main Oct 2, 2024
12 checks passed
karthikjeeyar pushed a commit to karthikjeeyar/community-plugins that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants