You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently support coverage via the coverage = True flag which outputs a text summary of the coverage collected by that rule. 9abc78f
This however does not merge coverage between targets
The solution is to use the bazel coverage command to aggregate and merge coverage reports from the various targets throughout a repository.
Currently sort of blocked by bazelbuild/bazel#5885
There is no general way to utilise bazel coverage but it is possible to hack around it.
Describe alternatives you've considered
This is the only option for coverage under jasmine throughout a repository
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 90 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs in two weeks. Collaborators can add a "cleanup" or "need: discussion" label to keep it open indefinitely. Thanks for your contributions to rules_nodejs!
🚀 feature request
Relevant Rules
jasmine_node_test
Description
Describe the solution you'd like
Add support for the
bazel coverage
commandWe currently support coverage via the
coverage = True
flag which outputs a text summary of the coverage collected by that rule. 9abc78fThis however does not merge coverage between targets
The solution is to use the
bazel coverage
command to aggregate and merge coverage reports from the various targets throughout a repository.Currently sort of blocked by bazelbuild/bazel#5885
There is no general way to utilise
bazel coverage
but it is possible to hack around it.Describe alternatives you've considered
This is the only option for coverage under jasmine throughout a repository
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: