Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create an empty marker providerSwiftClangModuleAspectInfo #1379

Conversation

brentleyjones
Copy link
Collaborator

that swift_clang_module_aspect always returns, so that other aspects can use required_aspect_providers to ensure correct ordering of aspect application and thus depend on the SwiftInfo provider attached by the aspect without having to unconditionally require it

PiperOrigin-RevId: 617942821
(cherry picked from commit f922a1d)

that `swift_clang_module_aspect` always returns, so that other aspects can use `required_aspect_providers` to ensure correct ordering of aspect application and thus depend on the `SwiftInfo` provider attached by the aspect without having to unconditionally require it

PiperOrigin-RevId: 617942821
(cherry picked from commit f922a1d)
Signed-off-by: Brentley Jones <github@brentleyjones.com>
brentleyjones referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…swift_clang_module_aspect` always returns, so that other aspects can use `required_aspect_providers` to ensure correct ordering of aspect application and thus depend on the `SwiftInfo` provider attached by the aspect without having to unconditionally require it.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 617942821
@brentleyjones brentleyjones merged commit cf9039b into master Oct 14, 2024
14 checks passed
@brentleyjones brentleyjones deleted the bj/create-an-empty-marker-provider-swiftclangmoduleaspectinfo branch October 14, 2024 03:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants