-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Registered entities in the "Other" Category should be added to OrgBook #322
Comments
BC Registries has requested these categories be added to OrgBook BC: CODE DESCRIPTION |
Do we recommend manually adding these to OrgBook or queuing them up as usual @WadeBarnes? Need a bit more clarification on were being asked to do here. |
@ianco — any chance you can give us your thoughts on this one? Have you looked into this at all? |
There are 2 steps - (1) update the jobs to include the new company types (this will start including any new changes going forward), and (2) run a job to bring over any existing companies with those types. For (1) the change is here: or: ... depending if the corps are in COLIN or LEAR (I think probably COLIN) For (2) I don't think we have an existing job to do this, I'd need to check. We did something similar when we added the Business Number credential, with this job: ... so something similar to bring over all credentials for existing companies for the new "in scope" types |
If they're not in COLIN or LEAR then we need a whole new job to pull the data, we need to confirm exactly where the data is coming from |
From a cursory glance it looks like they are coming through COLIN. I can query the BC Registries corp types and see all "OTHER" types: Here is what I was able to gather:
Some of the items like COOPs are not listed in the description above. Should all types be added or just the ones listed? |
For now — just the listed ones. |
@ianco is there any chance you'd be free to jump on a call this week to review the different scripts? There are a few different |
All of the corp types have been processed and exist in the event processor database and the ones that are/were not in scope (commented out of the list below) were skipped when it came to posting their credentials. von-bc-registries-agent/data-pipeline/bcreg/bcregistries.py Lines 40 to 75 in 3329164
Updates have been made to the event processor to include several other organization types to the in scope list; #324 Scripts have been added to the von-bc-registries-agent-configurations The related updates have been deployed to |
The code has been promoted to the OrbBook Test environment, and the von-bc-registries-agent-configurations Steps:
|
Note the entity type for the Financial records is not displaying correctly. Is this the fix; bcgov/orgbook-bc-client#185 |
These and the corresponding UI fixes, bcgov/orgbook-bc-client#185, have been deployed to |
@amanji, ready for testing |
The labels are now displaying properly but I think I agree with @swcurran. It's weird that they are pluralized while the others are singular. I'd like to propose updating to make those three labels in line and singularize them. |
The updates have been deployed to OrgBook |
All changes related to this ticket have been deployed to Loaded Organizations can be found here:
|
About 545 legal entities are in the "Other" category at BC Registries and are not loaded into OrgBook BC. This makes it impossible for those searching for these entities to find them in OrgBook BC. Propose that these entities be added to BC Gov, perhaps with a tag indicating how the information about them may differ from other entities -- notably that there is not a real-time feed of updates.
We have had 2 queries from people trying to find these entities in OrgBook or anywhere else. They can't even determine if they are registered entities. Their issue is that when they interact with other organizations that require proof of existence (e.g. banks, etc.) as is done for other registered entities -- they can't find the information in all "usual sources" such as OrgBook.
This is not a trivial update as (from what I understand) the records on these entities are not in the "normal" place. I'm not sure how many historical entities would properly be included in this feed and published on OrgBook.
Here is a list from BC Registries of the types of entities in "Other" and the number of entities impacted:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: