Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Parallelization bug / unsupported functionality #13

Open
belson17 opened this issue Sep 8, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Parallelization bug / unsupported functionality #13

belson17 opened this issue Sep 8, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
bug

Comments

@belson17
Copy link
Owner

belson17 commented Sep 8, 2016

parallelization bug.pdf
@belson17 belson17 added the bug label Jan 25, 2017
@jhtu
Copy link
Collaborator

jhtu commented Apr 21, 2020

Brandt do you have the actual source code, and perhaps the PNG of the screen output, from this email? That might help jump start the debugging process.

@belson17
Copy link
Owner Author

The pdf attached with the email chain is all I have. All I can take from it is that the in-memory classes may have a bug when run in parallel. I suspect that the problem is that each vector is loaded by every process/core. I think our assumption was that the vector handle system would be used for parallel, even if the vectors were in-memory. So the solution might be to just add that to the docs. What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@belson17 @jhtu