chore(ssz): Cleanup #1612
chore(ssz): Cleanup #1612
Conversation
WalkthroughThe code changes primarily involve moving the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Merkle
participant Bytes
participant NewHasher
User->>Merkle: Request Merkle Tree Root
Merkle->>Bytes: Initialize Buffer
Bytes-->>Merkle: Provide Buffer
Merkle->>NewHasher: Create with Buffer and Hash Function
NewHasher-->>Merkle: Return Hasher
Merkle->>Merkle: Build Parent Tree Roots
Merkle->>User: Return Merkle Tree Root
Poem
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (6)
- mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/buffer.go (1 hunks)
- mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/buffer_test.go (1 hunks)
- mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/hasher.go (3 hunks)
- mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/hasher_test.go (6 hunks)
- mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/tree.go (2 hunks)
- mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/merkleize.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/buffer.go (1)
21-21: Approved package declaration change.The change of the package from
merkletobytesaligns with the restructuring aimed at making buffer management more modular.mod/primitives/pkg/bytes/buffer_test.go (3)
21-21: Approved package declaration change in test file.The update of the package declaration from
merkle_testtobytes_testis consistent with the move of theBufferinterface.
28-28: Approved import path update.The import path change from
merkletobytescorrectly reflects the new location of theBufferinterface.
32-37: Test function updates are correct.The updates to the
getBufferfunction calls align with the changes in the buffer implementation. Ensuring that the tests cover bothreusableandsingleusescenarios is good for maintaining robustness.mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/tree.go (1)
224-236: Review ofMixinLengthfunction.The
MixinLengthfunction correctly computes a hash based on the input element and its length. However, there's a TODO comment about moving this function to thesszpackage. It's important to track this to ensure it's relocated appropriately to maintain modular design.mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/hasher.go (1)
46-60: Review ofHasherstruct andNewHasherfunction.The
Hasherstruct is well-defined, encapsulating both the buffer and hasher function. TheNewHasherfunction initializes these correctly. This setup facilitates the reusability and modularity of the hashing process.mod/primitives/pkg/ssz/merkleize.go (1)
252-253: Review of updatedMerkleizefunction.The update to use
bytes.NewSingleuseBufferandmerkle.BuildParentTreeRootsin theMerkleizefunction is correct and reflects the changes in buffer management and hashing functions. This should enhance the efficiency of the merkleization process.mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/hasher_test.go (2)
301-310: Clarify error handling expectations inrequireGoHashTreeEquivalence.The test checks for errors inconsistently. It should either always expect errors or handle them uniformly. Clarifying the expected behavior in the case of discrepancies between
merkle.BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutinesandgohashtree.Hashwould improve the test's reliability.Consider revising the error handling strategy to ensure consistency across all scenarios.
260-269: Verify the handling of division by zero inBuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines.This test aims to check the division by zero scenario by setting
nto zero. However, the expectation is not clear if it should error out or handle gracefully. The test expects no error, which might not be the intended behavior if division by zero should be an error.Verification successful
Verify the handling of division by zero in
BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines.The implementation of
BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutinesincludes a check to prevent division by zero by usingmax(n, 1). This ensures that the function handles the case whennis set to zero gracefully without causing a division by zero error.
- The relevant code snippet:
// Otherwise parallelize the hashing process for large inputs. // Take the max(n, 1) to prevent division by 0.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the expected behavior when `n` is set to zero in `BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines`. # Expect: Clear documentation or comments in the implementation of `BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines` regarding how division by zero is handled. rg --type go 'func BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines' mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of the `BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines` function to verify how it handles the case when `n` is zero. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines($_, $_, $_) { $$$ }' mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/hasher.goLength of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the implementation of the `BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines` function to verify how it handles the case when `n` is zero. rg --type go 'func BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines' -A 20 mod/primitives/pkg/merkle/hasher.goLength of output: 784
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // Test NewRootWithMaxLeaves with empty leaves. | ||
| func TestNewRootWithMaxLeaves_EmptyLeaves(t *testing.T) { | ||
| buffer := getBuffer("reusable") | ||
| hasher := merkle.NewHasher(buffer) | ||
| hasher := merkle.NewHasher(buffer, gohashtree.Hash) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update import paths in test cases due to package changes.
The NewHasher function calls in the test cases still reference the old package path. This needs to be updated to reflect the new structure where Hasher is part of the bytes package.
- hasher := merkle.NewHasher(buffer, gohashtree.Hash)
+ hasher := bytes.NewHasher(buffer, gohashtree.Hash)Also applies to: 56-56, 79-79, 103-103, 128-128
| for _, size := range sliceSizes { | ||
| t.Run( | ||
| fmt.Sprintf("Size%d", size*merkle.MinParallelizationSize), | ||
| func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| largeSlice := make( | ||
| [][32]byte, size*merkle.MinParallelizationSize, | ||
| ) | ||
| secondLargeSlice := make( | ||
| [][32]byte, size*merkle.MinParallelizationSize, | ||
| ) | ||
| hash1 := make([][32]byte, size*merkle.MinParallelizationSize) | ||
| hash2 := make([][32]byte, size*merkle.MinParallelizationSize) | ||
| var err error | ||
|
|
||
| err = merkle.BuildParentTreeRoots(hash1, largeSlice) | ||
| require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
|
||
| err = merkle.BuildParentTreeRoots(hash2, secondLargeSlice) | ||
| require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
|
||
| require.Equal( | ||
| t, | ||
| len(hash1), | ||
| len(hash2), | ||
| "Hash lengths should be equal", | ||
| ) | ||
| for i, r := range hash1 { | ||
| require.Equal( | ||
| t, | ||
| r, | ||
| hash2[i], | ||
| fmt.Sprintf("Hash mismatch at index %d", i), | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize the test setup in Test_HashTreeRootEqualInputs.
The test setup is creating large slices multiple times which might be inefficient. Consider using a setup function to initialize these slices once and reuse them across different subtests.
func setupLargeSlices(size int) ([][32]byte, [][32]byte) {
largeSlice := make([][32]byte, size*merkle.MinParallelizationSize)
secondLargeSlice := make([][32]byte, size*merkle.MinParallelizationSize)
return largeSlice, secondLargeSlice
}Then, use this setup function in your subtests.
| type Buffer[RootT ~[32]byte] interface { | ||
| // Get returns a slice of roots of the given size. | ||
| Get(size int) []RootT | ||
|
|
||
| // TODO: add a Put method to return the buffer back for multi-threaded use. | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider implementing the Put method soon.
The Buffer interface now includes a TODO for adding a Put method, which is crucial for efficient multi-threaded use. Implementing this method would help manage buffer reuse effectively, reducing garbage collection overhead.
Would you like assistance in designing the Put method to ensure thread safety and efficiency?
|
|
||
| // TODO: add a Put method to return the buffer back for multi-threaded use. | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding thread safety to reusableBuffer.
The comment indicates a planned addition of a mutex for multi-thread safety. It's important to implement this soon to avoid potential data races when the buffer is accessed concurrently.
+ import "sync"
type reusableBuffer[RootT ~[32]byte] struct {
internal []RootT
+ mutex sync.Mutex
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import "sync" | |
| type reusableBuffer[RootT ~[32]byte] struct { | |
| internal []RootT | |
| mutex sync.Mutex | |
| } |
| const ( | ||
| // MinParallelizationSize is the minimum size of the input list that | ||
| // should be hashed using the default method. If the input list is smaller | ||
| // than this size, the overhead of parallelizing the hashing process is. | ||
| // | ||
| // TODO: This value is arbitrary and should be benchmarked to find the | ||
| // optimal value. | ||
| MinParallelizationSize = 5000 | ||
| // two is a constant to make the linter happy. | ||
| two = 2 | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of constants for parallel processing.
The introduction of MinParallelizationSize and the constant two are well-documented. However, there's a TODO about benchmarking MinParallelizationSize which should be addressed to optimize performance.
Please ensure that benchmarking is conducted to find the optimal value for MinParallelizationSize.
| // BuildParentTreeRoots calls BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines with the | ||
| // number of routines set to runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0)-1. | ||
| func BuildParentTreeRoots[RootT ~[32]byte]( | ||
| outputList, inputList []RootT, | ||
| ) error { | ||
| err := BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines( | ||
| //#nosec:G103 // on purpose. | ||
| *(*[][32]byte)(unsafe.Pointer(&outputList)), | ||
| //#nosec:G103 // on purpose. | ||
| *(*[][32]byte)(unsafe.Pointer(&inputList)), | ||
| runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0)-1, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // Convert out back to []RootT using unsafe pointer cas | ||
| return err | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of BuildParentTreeRoots function.
The function now delegates to BuildParentTreeRootsWithNRoutines, optimizing for parallel processing. The use of unsafe pointers is marked clearly, which is good for future audits but should be handled with care.
Ensure that the use of unsafe pointers is continuously reviewed and audited to prevent security vulnerabilities.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MixinLengthfunction to calculate hashes based on input elements and their lengths.Improvements
Merkleizefunction for better initialization of thehashervariable, improving efficiency.Refactor
Bufferinterface to a new package for better organization.BuildParentTreeRootsfunction to use optimized parallel hashing.Tests