[ADAM-1655] Move R package to bdgenomics.adam.

[fnothaft]

Resolves #1655.

[AmplabJenkins]

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/2428/

Build result: FAILURE

[...truncated 15 lines...] > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ # timeout=15 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git rev-parse origin/pr/1764/merge^{commit} # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git branch -a -v --no-abbrev --contains 8b7894ecd179822fbcef235887718540bd5bd449 # timeout=10Checking out Revision 8b7894ecd179822fbcef235887718540bd5bd449 (origin/pr/1764/merge) > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > /home/jenkins/git2/bin/git checkout -f 8b7894ecd179822fbcef235887718540bd5bd449First time build. Skipping changelog.Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.11,1.6.3,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.11,1.6.3,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.11,2.2.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.10,1.6.3,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.10,1.6.3,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.10,2.2.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.10,2.2.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.11,2.2.0,centosADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.11,1.6.3,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.11,1.6.3,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.11,2.2.0,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.10,1.6.3,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.10,1.6.3,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.10,2.2.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.7.3,2.10,2.2.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.6.2,2.11,2.2.0,centos completed with result FAILURENotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

[AmplabJenkins]

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/2429/
Test PASSed.

[heuermh]

Looks good to me, any sequencing concerns for merge?

[fnothaft]

any sequencing concerns for merge?

This should go in before #1765, but otherwise no.

[heuermh]

Thank you, @fnothaft