Replies: 1 comment
-
|
That's a good suggestion. I think it makes sense |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The noBlankTarget option is currently in lint/a11y scope. However, after reading the explanation, I think it would be more correct to place it in the lint/security scope. Is there a reason why the lint rule is in the lint/a11y scope?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions