Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NodeJS sdk #60

Open
1 task done
syncush opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
1 task done

NodeJS sdk #60

syncush opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
A-Other Area: Other enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@syncush
Copy link

syncush commented Aug 3, 2023

Is there an existing proposal for this?

  • I have searched the existing proposals

Is your feature request related to a problem?

No

Describe the solution you'd like

I would like to have a library for using blazingMQ with NodeJS

Alternatives you considered

No response

@syncush syncush added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 3, 2023
@678098 678098 added the A-Other Area: Other label Aug 3, 2023
@quarter-note
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @syncush Thanks for your interest in the product. Are you saying that you'll be interested in implementing the client library?

@syncush
Copy link
Author

syncush commented Aug 4, 2023

Hi @quarter-note ,
I would love to take part in implementing such a library, although it might be a too challenging task for a junior dev.

What is the priority for a javascript client library on your side?

@hallfox
Copy link
Collaborator

hallfox commented Aug 4, 2023

Hi @syncush, we are not looking to create a javascript client library right now. Our focus for client library support is mostly going towards Python at this point. However, we'd love to see community supported client libraries for the languages we don't support (we've also gotten similar questions for C# client libs #35 and protocol specifications #28 for helping with this).

I think probably a good place to start here would be to find out how practical it would be to use libbmq in a Node addon. Even as we work on the protocol specification document, it would still be a lot of work to reimplement the client in any given language, so a bindings based approach might be a good way to get something functional without needing a deep knowledge of BlazingMQ's protocol. This is also the approach we've taken with our upcoming Python client library and it's been very successful.

@pniedzielski
Copy link
Collaborator

@syncush If you are interested in working on a Javascript client library, you may be interested in taking a look at our just-open-sourced Python SDK here. It binds our C++ library with a technique we've found works well, and you may be able to take inspiration for a potential Javascript library. You'll probably find that the Python SDK is much smaller and more accessible than either our C++ or Java SDKs for exactly this reason.

@marvin-hansen marvin-hansen mentioned this issue May 5, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Other Area: Other enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants