We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
call
call_end
While it is possible and perhaps desired to override the address:
revm/crates/revm/src/inspector.rs
Line 134 in 3608d2d
most of the time it is not needed.
Since we already made changes to the Inspector, I'm suggesting to make this return type a bit easier as well like
struct CreateOutcome {result: InterpreterResult, address: Option<Address>}
and some helper functions like CreateOutcome::continue() -> Self
CreateOutcome::continue() -> Self
what's the difference between the Option here:
Lines 114 to 118 in 3608d2d
and non optional here:
Lines 129 to 134 in 3608d2d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
May I take this?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Can you do it on top of the external_field branch? There are a few conflicting changes there
Sure!
has this been taken already
Yes sorry.
done
No branches or pull requests
While it is possible and perhaps desired to override the address:
revm/crates/revm/src/inspector.rs
Line 134 in 3608d2d
most of the time it is not needed.
Since we already made changes to the Inspector, I'm suggesting to make this return type a bit easier as well like
struct CreateOutcome {result: InterpreterResult, address: Option<Address>}
and some helper functions like
CreateOutcome::continue() -> Self
what's the difference between the Option here:
revm/crates/revm/src/inspector.rs
Lines 114 to 118 in 3608d2d
and non optional here:
revm/crates/revm/src/inspector.rs
Lines 129 to 134 in 3608d2d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: