Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(darwin): Rearrange code #1585

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023
Merged

refactor(darwin): Rearrange code #1585

merged 11 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023

Conversation

Gustl22
Copy link
Collaborator

@Gustl22 Gustl22 commented Jul 28, 2023

Description

Pick refactor code of #1549

Checklist

  • The title of my PR starts with a Conventional Commit prefix (fix:, feat:, refactor:,
    docs:, chore:, test:, ci: etc).
  • I have read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined for submitting PRs.
  • I have updated/added tests for ALL new/updated/fixed functionality.
  • I have updated/added relevant documentation and added dartdoc comments with ///, where necessary.
  • I have updated/added relevant examples in example.

Breaking Change

  • Yes, this is a breaking change.
  • No, this is not a breaking change.

Related Issues

#1549

@Gustl22 Gustl22 marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2023 22:13
@Gustl22 Gustl22 marked this pull request as draft July 28, 2023 22:13
@Gustl22 Gustl22 changed the title refactor(darwin): rearrange code refactor(darwin): Rearrange code Jul 29, 2023
@Gustl22 Gustl22 marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2023 13:44
@Gustl22 Gustl22 requested a review from spydon July 31, 2023 13:46
@Gustl22 Gustl22 enabled auto-merge (squash) August 1, 2023 09:52
@Gustl22 Gustl22 merged commit 13639d1 into main Aug 1, 2023
@Gustl22 Gustl22 deleted the gustl22/darwin-refactor branch August 1, 2023 10:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants