Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Transactions with 0 gwei are back² #2371

Closed
wellgamer789 opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 11 comments
Closed

Transactions with 0 gwei are back² #2371

wellgamer789 opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 11 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wellgamer789
Copy link

wellgamer789 commented Apr 5, 2024

#658
#1746

https://bscscan.com/txs?block=37593952
image

This contract has been interacted with for over 8 hours with only 0 gwei transactions..
https://bscscan.com/address/0x3aac3e2731421551c675c973080921f97d2489da
image
image

@wellgamer789
Copy link
Author

This has been happening for 24 hours, just this contract that I mentioned has already had interaction in 100K transactions with gwei 0, not to mention other bots.

@zzzckck zzzckck self-assigned this Apr 7, 2024
@zzzckck
Copy link
Collaborator

zzzckck commented Apr 7, 2024

This has been happening for 24 hours, just this contract that I mentioned has already had interaction in 100K transactions with gwei 0, not to mention other bots.

@wellgamer789 thank you for information, but they are probably the MEV bundle transactions. There are several MEV discussions on forum since last year: https://forum.bnbchain.org/search?q=mev
And there is also an official BEP: bnb-chain/BEPs#322.
There is no consensus rule to exclude zero gas price right now, so far it is as expected, there is not much we can do.

@zzzckck zzzckck mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2024
@wellgamer789
Copy link
Author

They are not bundle transactions, just check the transactions and blocks, they created a lot of contracts and tokens using 0 gwei, for example several bots "minting XEN token". It's impressive that this chain supports massive spam of these things at no cost.
image

@wellgamer789
Copy link
Author

Even scammers are taking advantage of this:
image

@zzzckck
Copy link
Collaborator

zzzckck commented Apr 8, 2024

They are not bundle transactions, just check the transactions and blocks, they created a lot of contracts and tokens using 0 gwei, for example several bots "minting XEN token". It's impressive that this chain supports massive spam of these things at no cost. image

noted, thank you for feedback, it is not good for the chain, will check.

@AlexKNM
Copy link

AlexKNM commented Apr 13, 2024

These transactions became a norm at 48 Club , Avengers, ..
https://bscscan.com/txs?block=37828567
https://bscscan.com/txs?block=37829010
and many other validators.

Is this a new norm where builders are allowed to add 0 cost transactions? or this is temporary bug?

@zzzckck
Copy link
Collaborator

zzzckck commented Apr 16, 2024

These transactions became a norm at 48 Club , Avengers, .. https://bscscan.com/txs?block=37828567 https://bscscan.com/txs?block=37829010 and many other validators.

Is this a new norm where builders are allowed to add 0 cost transactions? or this is temporary bug?

It is not a bug, some validators choose to accept zero gas price to promote their own project...
I think, we need to figure out a GasPrice rule, implementation is easy, but need to reach consensus across the community first.

@wellgamer789
Copy link
Author

Even scammers are taking advantage of this: image

:/

@kaber2
Copy link

kaber2 commented Apr 21, 2024

These transactions became a norm at 48 Club , Avengers, .. https://bscscan.com/txs?block=37828567 https://bscscan.com/txs?block=37829010 and many other validators.
Is this a new norm where builders are allowed to add 0 cost transactions? or this is temporary bug?

It is not a bug, some validators choose to accept zero gas price to promote their own project... I think, we need to figure out a GasPrice rule, implementation is easy, but need to reach consensus across the community first.

I believe there is actually broad consensus within the community that while it seems unavoidable that miners are offering MEV services, they shouldn't be lining their pockets by abusing there position.

So how about someone actually asks the community for their opinion and brings up a vote? It is trivial to enforce transaction ordering rules and minimum gas prices on the consensus level for everyone.

@zzzckck
Copy link
Collaborator

zzzckck commented Apr 25, 2024

close it right now, need to reach agreement across the community first, but not easy.

@zzzckck zzzckck closed this as completed Apr 25, 2024
@kaber2
Copy link

kaber2 commented Apr 27, 2024

As I said, the first step would be to actually ask the community instead of stating again and again that we need community consensus and then doing nothing to reach it.

Please reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants