Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
163 lines (110 loc) · 5.03 KB

README.rst

File metadata and controls

163 lines (110 loc) · 5.03 KB

BorgHash

Memory-efficient hashtable implementations as a Python library, implemented in Cython.

HashTable

HashTable is a rather low-level implementation, usually one rather wants to use the HashTableNT wrapper. But read on to get the basics...

Keys and Values

The keys MUST be perfectly random bytes of arbitrary, but constant length, like from a cryptographic hash (sha256, hmac-sha256, ...). The implementation relies on this "perfectly random" property and does not implement an own hash function, but just takes 32 bits from the given key.

The values are binary bytes of arbitrary, but constant length.

The length of the keys and values is defined when creating a HashTable instance (after that, the length must always match that defined length).

Implementation details

To have little memory overhead overall, the hashtable only stores uint32_t indexes into separate keys and values arrays (short: kv arrays).

A new key just gets appended to the keys array. The corresponding value gets appended to the values array. After that, the key and value do not change their index as long as they exist in the hashtable and the ht and kv arrays are in memory. Even when kv pairs are deleted from HashTable, the kv arrays never shrink and the indexes of other kv pairs don't change.

This is because we want to have stable array indexes for the keys/values so the indexes can be used outside of HashTable as memory-efficient references.

Memory allocated

For a hashtable load factor of 0.1 - 0.5, a kv array grow factor of 1.3 and N kv pairs, memory usage in bytes is approximately:

  • Hashtable: from N * 4 / 0.5 to N * 4 / 0.1
  • Keys/Values: from N * len(key+value) * 1.0 to N * len(key+value) * 1.3
  • Overall: from N * (8 + len(key+value)) to N * (40 + len(key+value) * 1.3)

When the hashtable or the kv arrays are resized, there will be short memory usage spikes. For the kv arrays, realloc() is used to avoid copying of data and memory usage spikes, if possible.

HashTableNT

HashTableNT is a convenience wrapper around HashTable:

  • accepts and returns namedtuple values
  • implements persistence: can read (write) the hashtable from (to) a file.

Keys and Values

Keys: bytes, see HashTable.

Values: any fixed type of namedtuple that can be serialized to bytes by Python's struct module using a given format string.

When setting a value, it is automatically serialized. When a value is returned, it will be a namedtuple of the given type.

Persistence

HashTableNT has .write() and .read() methods to save/load its content to/from a file, using an efficient binary format.

When a HashTableNT is saved to disk, only the non-deleted entries are persisted and when it is loaded from disk, a new hashtable and new, dense kv arrays are built - thus, kv indexes will be different!

API

HashTable / HashTableNT have an API similar to a dict:

  • __setitem__ / __getitem__ / __delitem__ / __contains__
  • get(), pop(), setdefault()
  • items(), len()
  • read(), write(), size()

Example code

# HashTableNT mapping 256bit key [bytes] --> Chunk value [namedtuple]
Chunk = namedtuple("Chunk", ["refcount", "size"])
ChunkFormat = namedtuple("ChunkFormat", ["refcount", "size"])
chunk_format = ChunkFormat(refcount="I", size="I")

# 256bit (32Byte) key, 2x 32bit (4Byte) values
ht = HashTableNT(key_size=32, value_type=Chunk, value_format=chunk_format)

key = b"x" * 32  # the key is usually from a cryptographic hash fn
value = Chunk(refcount=1, size=42)
ht[key] = value
assert ht[key] == value

for key, value in ht.items():
    assert isinstance(key, bytes)
    assert isinstance(value, Chunk)

file = "dump.bin"  # giving an fd of a file opened in binary mode also works
ht.write(file)
ht = HashTableNT.read(file)

Building / Installing

python setup.py build_ext --inplace
python -m build
pip install dist/borghash*.tar.gz

Want a demo?

Run borghash-demo after installing the borghash package.

It will show you the demo code, run it and print the results for your machine.

Results on an Apple MacBook Pro (M3 Pro CPU) are like:

HashTableNT in-memory ops (count=50000): insert: 0.062s, lookup: 0.066s, pop: 0.061s.
HashTableNT serialization (count=50000): write: 0.020s, read: 0.021s.

State of this project

API is still unstable and expected to change as development goes on.

As long as the API is unstable, there will be no data migration tools, like e.g. for reading an existing serialized hashtable.

There might be missing features or optimization potential, feedback welcome!

Borg?

Please note that this code is currently not used by the stable release of BorgBackup (aka "borg"), but might be used by borg master branch in the future.

License

BSD license.