Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

smaller storage for the install (maybe by installing only some services)? #3222

Closed
2 tasks
tooptoop4 opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks
Assignees
Labels
feature-request This issue requests a feature.

Comments

@tooptoop4
Copy link

Describe the feature

i am trying to include boto* in my docker image, i only have need for few services like kms/s3/sqs

but i see over 63MB storage taken by just service*json files:

find usr/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/boto* -type f -name '*json' -ls | awk '{ print $7 }'

Use Case

smaller python package means i can pack more concurrent pods on to my eks workers

Proposed Solution

have ability to install boto3[s3,kms,sqs] or similar without bringing in json/code for other aws services

Other Information

No response

Acknowledgements

  • I may be able to implement this feature request
  • This feature might incur a breaking change

SDK version used

boto3==1.21.38 botocore==1.24.38

Environment details (OS name and version, etc.)

Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

@tooptoop4 tooptoop4 added feature-request This issue requests a feature. needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. labels Apr 13, 2022
@tim-finnigan tim-finnigan self-assigned this Apr 13, 2022
@tim-finnigan
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tooptoop4 thanks for reaching out. This is something that is on the team’s radar. We are currently tracking the request here in the botocore repository: boto/botocore#2365

There is also some overlap here with another issue that I created regarding providing more insight into the startup time: boto/botocore#2553

Please feel free to 👍 or comment on those issues if you have additional feedback to add. I’m going to close this so we can keep tracking the discussions there.

@tim-finnigan tim-finnigan removed the needs-triage This issue or PR still needs to be triaged. label Apr 13, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request This issue requests a feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants