Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GEN-23: Revise Location #175

Closed
2 tasks done
dundarmete opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

GEN-23: Revise Location #175

dundarmete opened this issue Oct 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
@dundarmete @MustafaEmreErengul
Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Effort: Low This issue can be easily handled Priority: Medium This issue should be handled, if there isn't any high priority issue Requirements Issue is related to requirements elicitation Status: Review Needed A review is needed for this issue

Comments

@dundarmete
Copy link
Contributor

dundarmete commented Oct 15, 2022 •
edited by MustafaEmreErengul
Loading

What's up?

Refer to #162, revise the Location subtitle under the System Requirements and come up with improvements.

To Do

  • Revise the Location related System Requirements.
  • Share your ideas with other team members in the next meeting on 16.10.22 @18.00.

Deadline

22.10.22 @19.00

Additional Information

No response

Reviewers

@KarahanS
@dundarmete dundarmete added Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Effort: Low This issue can be easily handled Priority: Medium This issue should be handled, if there isn't any high priority issue Requirements Issue is related to requirements elicitation labels Oct 15, 2022
@sinemKocoglu
Copy link
Contributor

Requirement 1.2.6.1 is updated as

  • 1.2.6.1. The system shall be able to keep a record of users' locations when they share by using geotagging.

to remove ambiguity.

@MustafaEmreErengul
Copy link
Contributor

MustafaEmreErengul commented Oct 22, 2022 •
edited
Loading

The Location part of the Requirements is revised in the team meeting, and the related section is updated by @sinemKocoglu. Now a review of a team member is needed. @KarahanS

@MustafaEmreErengul MustafaEmreErengul added the Status: Review Needed A review is needed for this issue label Oct 22, 2022
@KarahanS
Copy link
Contributor

We have updated one of the requirements to remove the ambiguity. No further action is taken, closing the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dundarmete dundarmete

@MustafaEmreErengul MustafaEmreErengul

Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Effort: Low This issue can be easily handled Priority: Medium This issue should be handled, if there isn't any high priority issue Requirements Issue is related to requirements elicitation Status: Review Needed A review is needed for this issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@KarahanS @dundarmete @MustafaEmreErengul @sinemKocoglu