Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Joining hands with Bookmark Search Plus 2 (BSP2) #61

Open
Gitoffthelawn opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Joining hands with Bookmark Search Plus 2 (BSP2) #61

Gitoffthelawn opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
🧐 Needs More Info This doesn't seem right

Comments

@Gitoffthelawn
Copy link
Contributor

The recent posting of #60, and your open response, got me thinking (uh oh)... would it be possible to have Favioli and BSP2 cooperate with each other so Favioli icons appear in BSP2?

@bpevs
Copy link
Owner

bpevs commented Aug 9, 2022

I assume you mean this project?
https://github.com/aaFn/Bookmark-search-plus-2

Since it fetches favicons itself (no access to cached favicons), the only way I can think of is if favicon selection utility was to be exported as a module that BSP2 uses. It would be a very favioli-specific feature (basically importing the decision engine to be used within BSP2).

Favioli does not and will not store any data on any external source, and browsers sandbox local data, so I don't think it is possible to have any kind of communication between the apps.

For this one... I'm not necessarily against exporting a utility to do this, but would need buy-n from BSP2, and imo would be kinda a weird addition to that extension heh.

#60 and #52 are mostly unrelated, and I think shouldn't be too hard, since similar prior favicon caching projects exist. Just haven't done it yet cuz lazy.

@bpevs bpevs added the 🧐 Needs More Info This doesn't seem right label Aug 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🧐 Needs More Info This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants