Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CLOSED] Fix box model regression (transform) #11307

Open
core-ai-bot opened this issue Aug 30, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

[CLOSED] Fix box model regression (transform) #11307

core-ai-bot opened this issue Aug 30, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@core-ai-bot
Copy link
Member

Issue by Worie
Friday May 05, 2017 at 17:59 GMT
Originally opened as adobe/brackets#13357


Hi. In my recent commit adobe/brackets@ad915c7 for whatever reason I've removed a piece of code that made showing the box-model of transformed elements appear OK. I must have discarded the wrong hunk and did not refresh Brackets afterwards, so I didn't see it was broken. I'm very sorry for that.

This PR fixes this regression. However, we should consider visual testing to this feature to prevent such cases #13356 .

For now, could you ensure that it looks good for transformed elements, too (with or without borders, etc). I have tested it, but as you can see you can never be too cautios.


Worie included the following code: https://github.com/adobe/brackets/pull/13357/commits

@core-ai-bot
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by petetnt
Saturday May 06, 2017 at 11:19 GMT


Meanwhile visual tests you could write a test project that showcases the possible options too 🤔 I think I reviewed that commit, sorry for not catching it myself.

@core-ai-bot
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by Worie
Wednesday May 24, 2017 at 17:20 GMT


What about this one? Shall we merge it? There's no reason to keep it hanging, as the master still has broken version of RemoteFunctions.js.

I remember about the showcases with the options but I'm quite busy recently, so it'll have to wait.

@core-ai-bot
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by petetnt
Wednesday May 24, 2017 at 17:28 GMT


Thanks@Worie

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant