You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The R-Index by Schimack (2014) intends to penalize QRPs (Questionable Research Practices) and is a "doping test for science." We should be able to use the output from txnsim() to come up with our own version of the R-Index and in so doing add to the list of diagnostic tools available in blotter/quantstrat for determining luck vs skill or overfitting.
Statistical Power (or Success Rate) in Schimmack is defined as the LR probability of finding a significant result. From a large enough 'n' in txnsim() we could rely on the pvalues output of our strategy within the sampled distribution.
For Effect Size (or Inflation) we could rely on the effsize R package. This will require more research.
Below are more references that could prove useful, from the blog replicationindex.wordpress.com
The R-Index by Schimack (2014) intends to penalize QRPs (Questionable Research Practices) and is a "doping test for science." We should be able to use the output from txnsim() to come up with our own version of the R-Index and in so doing add to the list of diagnostic tools available in blotter/quantstrat for determining luck vs skill or overfitting.
http://www.r-index.org/uploads/3/5/6/7/3567479/introduction_to_the_r-index__14-12-01.pdf
where
and
Statistical Power (or Success Rate) in Schimmack is defined as the LR probability of finding a significant result. From a large enough 'n' in txnsim() we could rely on the pvalues output of our strategy within the sampled distribution.
For Effect Size (or Inflation) we could rely on the effsize R package. This will require more research.
Below are more references that could prove useful, from the blog replicationindex.wordpress.com
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: