We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we have statement fields which are used in Issue, Offer, and Contract.
statement
Issue
Offer
Contract
stm_title
stm_body
stm_issue_uuid
stm_tracker_uuid
stm_status
The statement field names are the same across all classes, but the purpose differs:
For our field-names to be more intention revealing, probably it would be good to either:
src_title
match_title
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like both rename suggestions equally well, maybe do both?
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Currently we have
statement
fields which are used inIssue
,Offer
, andContract
.stm_title
stm_body
stm_issue_uuid
stm_tracker_uuid
stm_status
The statement field names are the same across all classes, but the purpose differs:
Issue
- holds the source dataOffer
andContract
- query values used to match and evaluateFor our field-names to be more intention revealing, probably it would be good to either:
Issue
(egstm_title
->src_title
)Offer
andContract
(egstm_title
->match_title
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: