New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Test case for indirect containment is incorrect #325

Open

Moult opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

please contribute tests

Milestone

Contributor

Moult commented Jun 20, 2024

https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/development/Documentation/testcases/partof/pass-the_containment_can_be_indirect_1_2.ifc

The beam should be contained in the space, not aggregated.

Also, there should be two interpretations of 'indirect' containment.

Interpretation 1: PASS - a beam in a space: Beam <-- RelAgg --> ElementAssembly <-- RelContain --> Space
Interpretation 2: PASS (or FAIL?) - a beam in a building: Beam <-- RelContain --> Space <-- RelAgg --> Building

atomczak added tests todo labels

atomczak added please contribute and removed todo labels

atomczak added this to the 1.0 milestone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment