Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add include keyword to wit grammar #17

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 3, 2023
Merged

Conversation

eduardomourar
Copy link
Collaborator

@eduardomourar eduardomourar commented Jul 2, 2023

In order to support the Union of Worlds proposal, we will add the include keyword to the WIT grammar.

Closes: #14.

@eduardomourar eduardomourar requested a review from Mossaka July 2, 2023 21:39
Copy link
Member

@Mossaka Mossaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! thanks!

@eduardomourar eduardomourar merged commit dcc5a30 into main Jul 3, 2023
@eduardomourar eduardomourar deleted the feat/include-keyword branch July 3, 2023 21:12
eduardomourar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.1.2](wit-idl-v0.1.1...wit-idl-v0.1.2)
(2023-07-03)


### Features

* add include keyword to wit grammar
([#17](#17))
([dcc5a30](dcc5a30))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: Eduardo Rodrigues <eduardomourar@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2023

🎉 This change has been included in wit-idl-v0.1.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your release-please bot 🚀🙏

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add include syntax to WIT grammar
2 participants