You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now, if the signal is sidechaining itself, it might still be desired to multiply inL and inR with *params[param_sc_level]. If the idea of "sc routing" set to false is that the input signal is also the sidechain signal, that sidechain signal should maybe also be multiplied with "sc level".
Background: LMMS can only handle 2 inputs, so many users "abuse" the "sc level" parameter for sidechaining: The sidechain signal feeds a peak controller, and the sc level is being connected to that controller. This worked with CALF 0.19, but fails with master (more exactly, since 83ce593 ).
IIRC, if the parameter "sc route" is false, the sidechain signal is discarded, and the input sidechains itself:
Now, if the signal is sidechaining itself, it might still be desired to multiply
inL
andinR
with*params[param_sc_level]
. If the idea of "sc routing" set to false is that the input signal is also the sidechain signal, that sidechain signal should maybe also be multiplied with "sc level".Background: LMMS can only handle 2 inputs, so many users "abuse" the "sc level" parameter for sidechaining: The sidechain signal feeds a peak controller, and the sc level is being connected to that controller. This worked with CALF 0.19, but fails with master (more exactly, since 83ce593 ).
Thanks to @karmux for finding.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: