You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While testing combinations for "other" industries, I found that for some cases (e.g., not processing Chemicals Industry individually), dividing useful energy over final energy leads to efficiencies above zero.
This issue comes from the JRC processing, in the build/data/jrc-idees/industry/processed-energy.nc file.
I propose the following:
Adding an assure statement that catches this on the JRC module.
Fixing it (if we introduce the problem) or ensuring it does not occur (if it's an issue in JRC data).
What happened?
While testing combinations for "other" industries, I found that for some cases (e.g., not processing Chemicals Industry individually), dividing useful energy over final energy leads to efficiencies above zero.
This issue comes from the JRC processing, in the
build/data/jrc-idees/industry/processed-energy.nc
file.I propose the following:
assure
statement that catches this on the JRC module.Version
1.2.0.dev
Relevant log output
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: