Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] A unify api key management for tools #950

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
lightaime opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1176
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

[Feature Request] A unify api key management for tools #950

lightaime opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1176
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request New Feature P1 Task with middle level priority
Milestone

Comments

@lightaime
Copy link
Member

Required prerequisites

Motivation

It is difficult for users to create all api keys for tools. We can have a unified api key for users to use all available tools in CAMEL.

This feature maybe some research and design.

Solution

No response

Alternatives

No response

Additional context

No response

@lightaime lightaime added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 13, 2024
@lightaime lightaime self-assigned this Sep 13, 2024
@Wendong-Fan Wendong-Fan added New Feature call for contribution P1 Task with middle level priority labels Sep 20, 2024
@Wendong-Fan Wendong-Fan added this to the Sprint 13 milestone Sep 20, 2024
@Wendong-Fan
Copy link
Member

Wendong-Fan commented Sep 23, 2024

Guohao: do we have one-stop api key can do all tool calling? how did Composio make it

@Wendong-Fan
Copy link
Member

for new features we need to maintain the api key list

@Wendong-Fan
Copy link
Member

comment from @koch3092 , we can use Pydantic setting to manage this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request New Feature P1 Task with middle level priority
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants