We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
images:
On images:, most images have a default and a cloud variant. However, their description doesn't mention which is which, only the name.
Here's my local image cache after creating instances from images:centos/9-Stream/cloud and images:centos/9-Stream for example:
images:centos/9-Stream/cloud
images:centos/9-Stream
$ lxc image list | grep CentOS | | a7e9ed301bb3 | no | CentOS 9-Stream amd64 (20240820_0021) | x86_64 | VIRTUAL-MACHINE | 756.41MiB | Aug 20, 2024 at 3:35pm (UTC) | | | b7677aa8cb8f | no | CentOS 9-Stream amd64 (20240819_0022) | x86_64 | VIRTUAL-MACHINE | 735.50MiB | Aug 20, 2024 at 3:50pm (UTC) |
It's hard to infer which is which. Augmenting the description with the variant should make it less ambiguous.
Also, repeating the architecture in the description while there is a dedicated field for the architecture feels uneeded.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
On
images:
, most images have a default and a cloud variant. However, their description doesn't mention which is which, only the name.Here's my local image cache after creating instances from
images:centos/9-Stream/cloud
andimages:centos/9-Stream
for example:It's hard to infer which is which. Augmenting the description with the variant should make it less ambiguous.
Also, repeating the architecture in the description while there is a dedicated field for the architecture feels uneeded.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: