-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add forMapOf like forEachOf #1133
Comments
I think you're better off using Also note that |
I think we're going to separate out object functionality in to |
Brings the questions of whether the key+value should be accessible for those implementations and whether we should keep a unary version (each vs eachOf, map vs mapOf) |
I think we should pass |
I could work perfectly with the behaviour in v2.0.0-rc.5, there i step over object keys without access to the key name but since v2.0.0-rc.6 i give an object and get an array back, that won't work. I added my workarround from the first post again to get it working again! |
I would like to have a async.map method working on objects like the async.forEachOf does. As a working wrapper I currently use (as coffeescript):
Is it possible to integrate such functionality directly with it's limit and series partners?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: