Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] brew cask outdated #9490

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

[WIP] brew cask outdated #9490

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

phinze
Copy link
Contributor

@phinze phinze commented Feb 8, 2015

No description provided.

@fanquake fanquake added the core Issue with Homebrew itself rather than with a specific cask. label Feb 9, 2015
@alebcay
Copy link
Member

alebcay commented Feb 10, 2015

Prerequisite for new upgrade verb (#4678).

@rolandwalker rolandwalker mentioned this pull request Feb 10, 2015
87 tasks
@mattfelsen
Copy link
Contributor

This is exciting! What else needs to happen here before this PR is merged? I looked through issue #9403 but don't see any further requisites since it looks like support for :latest is being skipped for now.

@RickWong
Copy link

RickWong commented Apr 9, 2015

✅ Please merge this. It's super useful.

@thom-nic
Copy link

Any word on why this is stalled? Using brew outdated is super useful and it's a shame cask still doesn't have the same capability.

@alebcay
Copy link
Member

alebcay commented Jul 27, 2015

@phinze is this still WIP?

@jawshooah jawshooah added enhancement awaiting maintainer feedback Issue needs response from a maintainer. labels Jul 27, 2015
@xyb
Copy link
Contributor

xyb commented Sep 21, 2015

What are we waiting for? Add a test case before merge this?

@salimane
Copy link

salimane commented Nov 8, 2015

let's merge this 👍

@vitorgalvao
Copy link
Member

@salimane No, lets not merge this. It is clearly marked as a work in progress. Why would we just merge it?

@salimane
Copy link

salimane commented Nov 9, 2015

@victorpopkov my bad, I was just excited to see this being worked on :)

@phinze
Copy link
Contributor Author

phinze commented Nov 16, 2015

Anyone else is welcome to pick up this work, but I'm not pushing it forward anytime soon. Closing to reduce repo noise.

@phinze phinze closed this Nov 16, 2015
@phinze phinze deleted the brew-cask-outdated branch November 16, 2015 22:30
@adidalal adidalal removed the awaiting maintainer feedback Issue needs response from a maintainer. label Jan 3, 2016
@bgandon
Copy link
Contributor

bgandon commented Feb 22, 2016

Guys, for those who have been waiting for years the unicorn-ish brew cask outdated to be implemented, I just released a brew-cask-outdated workaround script that does the job.

See: https://github.com/bgandon/brew-cask-outdated

Any help for packaging a Homebrew formula would be more than welcome!

Cheers

@salimane
Copy link

@bgandon 👍

@vitorgalvao
Copy link
Member

@salimane Again, I ask you refrain from useless “+1” and thumbs up comments. They only add noise.

@bgandon It’s always the users who never contributed and know nothing of the project that act the more entitled. I saw your deleted comments, and your absolute disrespect for the team paints you as the type of person that causes open source maintainers to burn out.

If all you wanted was a script, other users have done them in the past and presented them here respectfully and amicably. You’re not special, and your script isn’t impressive. Why not you make the contribution to the core itself?

Once the new install behaviour is implemented (which is only getting sooner), your script will stop working, because the method you use to check for outdated versions is deeply unreliable now and will completely break under the new behaviour.

No, this is not a simple addition like you valiantly claimed it is, and you would’ve known that if you read the issue linked in the huge bold letters at the top of the README.

We’re not here to serve you. We define priorities by what we feel is important and what the team has time to work on. Many small things need fixing before we can tackle big things and do them well. If you felt some things needed to exist already and didn’t understand why they didn’t, you should’ve asked and we would’ve told you.

I kindly ask you take your toxic atitude elsewhere. You’re no longer welcome.

Locking the issue since nothing of worth was added since it was closed. Anyone that wants to pick up the effort already made here is very welcome to do so.

@Homebrew Homebrew locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 22, 2016
@vitorgalvao
Copy link
Member

My appologies to the other intervenients in this issue, but I take the responsibility of managing this project seriously, and find it abolutely disrespectful when someone appears from nowhere with no history of contributions or meaningful interactions and starts making demands of the free time of others and insulting the team of maintainers (even if those comments were since deleted).

@phinze
Copy link
Contributor Author

phinze commented Feb 22, 2016

Some relevant context from another thread:

feature_request__ brew_cask_outdated _ issue__19115 _caskroom_homebrew-cask

@miccal miccal removed core Issue with Homebrew itself rather than with a specific cask. enhancement labels Dec 23, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet