You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was looking into adding duo support (k-way ranking potentially) for MSMARCO and TREC-CAR.
For RelevanceExample, I was wondering if we can have documents as Union(List[Text], List[List[Text]]) instead of just List[Text]. I could also do something like this in the evaluate method in RerankerEvaluator. Another way is to add an is_duo argument to the various reranks/class.
Yeah, that sounds good to me! For now, I would worry only about duo and forget about the general case as we don't even know how to make it computationally viable
I was looking into adding duo support (k-way ranking potentially) for MSMARCO and TREC-CAR.
For RelevanceExample, I was wondering if we can have documents as Union(List[Text], List[List[Text]]) instead of just List[Text]. I could also do something like this in the evaluate method in RerankerEvaluator. Another way is to add an is_duo argument to the various reranks/class.
Thoughts? @daemon @rodrigonogueira4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: