Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Would you like the cargo-rpm crate? #33

Closed
tony-iqlusion opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Would you like the cargo-rpm crate? #33

tony-iqlusion opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@tony-iqlusion
Copy link

The cargo-rpm crate is unmaintained: iqlusioninc/cargo-rpm#96

If you'd like, we could give you the cargo-rpm crate name and you could potentially publish future releases of cargo-generate-rpm under that.

@cat-in-136
Copy link
Owner

@tony-iqlusion , Thank you for the proposal. But my answer is no.

cargo-generate-rpm has different approach than cargo-rpm --- do without rpmbuild. I thought it was better not to use the cargo-rpm crate name for my app to avoid user misunderstanding and compatibility issues.

@cat-in-136 cat-in-136 added the question Further information is requested label Jul 20, 2022
@tony-iqlusion
Copy link
Author

I think it's great you used rpm-rs. It didn't exist at the time I wrote cargo rpm unfortunately. We have a lot of open issues surrounding invoking rpmbuild.

Given that I think I'll officially deprecate cargo-rpm and point users at cargo-generate-rpm.

If you'd ever like the cargo-rpm crate name in the future, let me know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants