Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Table Column Change issue, gives two columns in o/p #26

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 26, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

Table Column Change issue, gives two columns in o/p #26

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Jan 26, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

 Hi, 
 i am facing one issue while comparing HTML using daisydiff.
Seems to me that when i give simple two tables for comparison where difference 
in data is in table columns then it throws additional column in o/p.Following 
are steps to reproduce & attached screenshots of problem.

1: Give left side for comparison as 

<table border=2><tr border=2><td border=2>column1</td><td 
border=2>column2</td><td border=2>column3</td></tr><tr border=2><td 
border=2>1</td><td border=2>2</td><td border=2>3</td></tr></table>

2: Give right side for comparison as

<table border=2><tr border=2><td border=2>column1</td><td 
border=2>column2</td><td border=2>column3</td></tr><tr border=2><td 
border=2>1</td><td border=2>22</td><td border=2>3</td></tr></table>

observe difference is in 2nd column's data for left side its 2 & for right its 
22

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

This results in addition of column (td) for final data which disturbs whole UI. 
Expected output is such that either this should add additional column in header 
columns or it should put difference data in single column

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
daisydiff 1.1 & Windows XP

Please provide any additional information below.
Attaching Screenshots for reference, this shift in column cuases large 
usability issue

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ame...@gmail.com on 9 Aug 2010 at 11:44

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Confirmed in DaisyDiff 1.1

Original comment by kkape...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2010 at 3:17

  • Changed state: Accepted

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hi Kapelon,
 thanks for accepting it as defect, when can i expect fix for this one? you guys are planning to fix this in DaisyDiff 1.2 version?

Original comment by ame...@gmail.com on 10 Aug 2010 at 5:48

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I can't really answer this question since I am not one of the core developers. 
DaisyDiff seems to be in "maintainance" mode these days.

Speaking for myself only, I do not have the needed expertise/time to fix this 
bug.


Original comment by kkape...@gmail.com on 11 Aug 2010 at 9:00

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

There are currently no plans for a new release of DaisyDiff. 
I'm the original developer, but I don't have the time anymore to work on 
DaisyDiff. Ofcourse I would welcome a volunteer that can take things over.

Original comment by guy...@gmail.com on 11 Aug 2010 at 9:27

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hi, I'm happy to work on a fix for this as it affects me too. I'd appreciate 
any input or suggestions from experienced committers as to the best heuristic 
to use....

Original comment by joelhalb...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2010 at 4:29

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I cannot really help you with the implementation part. However if you create a 
patch that solves this issue and does not break anything else, we would be 
happy to commit it in the official trunk!

Original comment by kkape...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2010 at 6:00

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

[deleted comment]

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

http://code.google.com/p/daisydiff/issues/detail?id=28 seems to fix this.

Original comment by don.jp.w...@gmail.com on 15 Jun 2011 at 5:30

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant